In Cable Ebola Coverage, It’s the Story vs. the Facts | TIME:
So Thursday night, the facts were: Someone in New York City had Ebola.
 Dr. Craig Spencer, who had been volunteering with Doctors Without 
Borders treating patients in Guinea, had come back to Manhattan. He’d 
followed the accepted guidelines for self-monitoring, checking his temperature twice daily, and watching, per the medical organization’s guidelines,
 for “relevant symptoms including fever.” When he detected a fever that 
morning–before which, he would not have been infectious–he went to the 
hospital.
But then there’s the story! The story was that the day before Spencer
 went to the hospital, he went bowling! He rode in an Uber vehicle! He 
went jogging and ate at a restaurant and walked in a park. He rode the 
subway–the crowded subway! None of this, according to medical science on
 Ebola, presented a danger from a nonsymptomatic person. But it felt wrong in people’s guts. And that makes a better story.
Francis
 is charismatic, popular, widely beloved. He has, until this point, 
faced strong criticism only from the church’s traditionalist fringe, and
 managed to unite most Catholics in admiration for his ministry. There 
are ways that he can shape the church without calling doctrine into 
question, and avenues he can explore (annulment reform, in particular) 
that would bring more people back to the sacraments without a crisis. He
 can be, as he clearly wishes to be, a progressive pope, a pope of 
social justice — and he does not have to break the church to do it.